Now add on to that glut another category of product that stores have to deal with: returns.
So instead of piling returned merchandise onto this growing inventory heap, stores are considering just handing customers their money back and letting them hang onto the stuff they don’t want.
“It would be a smart strategic initiative,” said Burt Flickinger, retail expert and managing director of retail consultancy Strategic Resource Group. “Retailers are stuck with excess inventory of unprecedented levels. They can’t afford to take back even more of it.”
Returned products are handled in a number of different ways, he said. Retailers take back merchandise from the customer, evaluate it, and if it’s in good condition put it back on the shelf at the same or lesser price.
They can refurbish damaged returns and sell them for less or offload them to liquidators to resell. They also can sell returned products to foreign liquidators for sale in Europe, Canada or Mexico.
“Given the situation at the ports and the container shortages, sending product overseas isn’t really an option,” said Flickinger. Lastly, retailers can hire third party firms to handle all aspect of merchandise returns for them.
Each of these options, however, tack on additional costs for retailers, he said.
“For every dollar in sales, a retailer’s net profit is between a hundred to five cents. With returns, for every dollar in returned merchandise, it costs a retailer between 15 cents to 30 cents to handle it,” said Flickinger.
There is one other option for retailers to address returns while avoiding more product bloat and that’s to consider a ‘returnless return,’ said Steve Rop, chief operating officer with goTRG, a firm that processes over 100 million returned items annually for companies like Wal- Mart, Amazon and Lowe’s.
Just keep it
Rop said his company’s customers are 100% considering offering the “keep it” option for returns this year, although he wouldn’t disclose if any of his customers have implemented the “Keep it” returns policy yet.
In some instances, when they determine it would be easier, some retailers advise customers to just keep or donate their return after issuing a refund. Walmart said it had nothing to share at this time. Lowe’s didn’t provide a comment for the story.
“They’re already discounting in stores to clear out products but, when there’s heavy discounting, buyer’s remorse goes up. People are tempted to buy a lot to only return it later,” he said.
Refunding customers while simultaneously letting them keep their returns isn’t a new practice, said Rop. “It started with Amazon several years ago,” he said.
The offer makes sense for some types of products — lower price-tier bulky items like furniture, kitchen appliances, home decor, baby chairs, walkers, strollers where it’s costly for the retailer to cover the shipping cost for the return.
“Other products like kids’ toys, footwear, towels and bedding raise sanitary concerns when it comes to returns. It could also apply to these categories,” he said.
Another concern with cheaper items: Stores typically discount returned products, so the amount of money they can make on an inexpensive return is miniscule — and may not be worth the tradeoff, says Keith Daniels, partner with Carl Marks Advisors.
Still, a “keep it” policy has its own disadvantages, namely: Companies will need to ensure that they don’t become victims of fraud.
“One thing retailers need to track and ensure is that customers that become aware of the [Keep it] policy do not begin to abuse it, by seeking free merchandise over a series of orders by getting a refund but getting to keep the merchandise,” said Daniels.